Russ August & Kabat Attorneys Recognized as 2011 Rising Stars July 2011

Russ August & Kabat Attorneys Recognized as 2011 Rising Stars July 2011

Super Lawyers Rising Stars EditionJuly 2011

Russ August & Kabat Attorneys Alexander C.D. Giza, Andrew D. Weiss, Irene Y. Lee, Michael S. Brophy, Nathan D. Meyer and Robert F. Gookin Recognized as 2011 Southern California Rising Stars

Rising Stars are the top 2.5% percent of attorneys in each state, under 40 years old and/or who have been practicing for 10 years or less, as chosen by their peers and through an independent research. Law & Politics performs the polling, research and selection of Rising Stars in a process designed to identify lawyers who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. Rising Stars is a comprehensive and diverse listing of outstanding attorneys, representing a wide range of practice areas, firm sizes and geographic locations.

Alexander C.D. Giza’s practice encompasses high technology and intellectual property matters, including patent and trade secret litigation, patent prosecution/due diligence/licensing and appellate matters. Mr. Giza earned a Bachelor’s Degree in Electrical Engineering at the University of Virginia and worked as an electrical engineer for Westinghouse, IAI America and Eaton. Mr. Giza has represented clients regarding technologies across the spectrum, including digital video recorders, semiconductor design, video conferencing, liquid crystal displays, computer hard drives, digital watermarking, laptop computer modems, random number generators, music channel broadcasting, ATSC television receivers, video encoding/decoding and MEMS technology. He received his J.D. from UCLA School of Law and is registered to practice in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Andrew D. Weiss’ practice focuses on intellectual property and litigation matters, primarily patent litigation. He has represented a variety of clients, including technology, internet, semiconductor, manufacturing and apparel companies. Mr. Weiss also assists clients in non-litigation intellectual property-related matters, such as identifying and patenting inventions. He is a graduate of the University of Southern California Gould School of Law and has an undergraduate degree in Computer Science.

Irene Y. Lee’s practice focuses on intellectual property matters, with an emphasis on patent and trademark enforcement and licensing. As a registered patent attorney licensed to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, she brings her patent prosecution experience to strategizing litigation matters and licensing issues. Through patent, trademark and Internet-related litigation, she has enforced intellectual property rights of some of the world’s largest medical device, computer software and apparel companies, as well as small to medium-sized businesses and individuals. She provides preventative counseling through rendering opinions and reviewing potential investments concerning intellectual property. Ms. Lee received her J.D. from Loyola Law School, where she served as the Vice President of St. Thomas More Honor Society. She earned her Bachelor of Science in biochemistry from UCLA.

Michael S. Brophy’s practice focuses on probate litigation, intellectual property, entertainment and employment matters. He has extensive experience in trust and estate litigation, copyright, Lanham Act, trade secret, patent, unfair competition, contract, and wrongful termination matters. In addition to litigation matters, his experience includes risk assessment and counseling, alternative dispute resolution, and administrative proceedings. Mr. Brophy received his J.D. from Harvard Law School.

Nathan D. Meyer’s practice focuses on general litigation and intellectual property matters, with an emphasis on general business litigation and soft IP. His experience includes copyright, apparel, contract and real estate litigation. Mr. Meyer is a graduate of Harvard Law School and Harvard College.

Robert F. Gookin’s practice focuses on intellectual property, complex commercial litigation and probate litigation. Mr. Gookin has been extensively involved in all aspects of patent, trademark, securities, probate and complex business litigation. He received his B.A. from Columbia College and his J.D., cum laude, from Loyola Law School, where he was elected Order of the Coif. Mr. Gookin was a staff member on the Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review and a member of the St. Thomas More Law Honor Society.

Russ August & Kabat Wins $11.6 Million Jury Verdict In Patent Case June 2011

Russ August & Kabat Wins $11.6 Million Jury Verdict In Patent Case June 2011

Law 360 News ReleaseRuss August & Kabat attorneys Marc A. Fenster, Jules L. Kabat, Alexander C.D. Giza, Adam S. Hoffman, Benjamin T. Wang, Michael S. Brophy, and Stanley H. Thompson, Jr. won a unanimous jury verdict of $11.6 million in favor of their client, Clear With Computers, LLC (“CWC”), on June 17, 2011.

CWC sued Hyundai Motor America, Inc. in the Eastern District of Texas for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,606,739, which relates to customized sales proposals. After a week-long trial, the jury found infringement of all asserted claims of the patent, and rejected Hyundai’s defenses of invalidity by anticipation, obviousness and inadequate written description. In addition, the jury awarded CWC more damages than the $10 million CWC requested in its closing arguments, awarding $11.6 million in damages through trial. Hyundai was represented by Gene C. Schaerr, Peter McCabe III, and John Moss of the international law firm of Winston & Strawn LLP, and Douglas R. McSwane, Jr. of Potter Minton P.C.

See Article.

Russ August & Kabat Wins Back-to-Back Summary Judgment Rulings and Motion for Clarification In Texas Patent Case June 2011

Russ August & Kabat Wins Back-to-Back Summary Judgment Rulings and Motion for Clarification In Texas Patent Case June 2011

Russ August & Kabat NewsRuss August & Kabat attorneys Benjamin T. Wang, Marc Fenster, Alex Giza, Adam Hoffman, Michael Brophy and Stanley Thompson won back-to-back summary judgment rulings and a motion for clarification on behalf of client, Clear With Computers, LLC. Judge Leonard Davis of the Eastern District of Texas granted the motions.

The Court agreed that defendant Hyundai Motor America, Inc. could not avoid liability for infringement of the patent-in-suit, which relates to customized sales proposals, under the theory of divided infringement. The Court held that “CWC presented overwhelming evidence” in support of its motion. In addition, the Court simultaneously denied Hyundai’s own cross-motion for summary judgment of non-infringement based on Hyundai’s theory of divided infringement.

Russ August & Kabat Attorneys Larry Russ and Nathan Meyer Publish Article in California Lawyer Magazine June 2011

Russ August & Kabat Attorneys Larry Russ and Nathan Meyer Publish Article in California Lawyer Magazine June 2011

Russ August & Kabat lawyers Larry C. Russ and Nathan D. Meyer co-authored an article, “Protectable Plaids,” which was published in the June 2011 issue of California Lawyer Magazine. A ruling last year in a battle between two apparel rivals offers guidance for future copyright claimants. In Express LLC v. Forever 21, Inc. (2010 WL 3489308 (C.D. Cal.), a Los Angeles federal judge rejected a manufacturer’s copyright claims based on the use of purportedly protectable plaid designs on shorts.

Read the opinion.

Russ August & Kabat Closes $200+ Million Dollar Real Estate Deal March 2011

Russ August & Kabat Closes $200+ Million Dollar Real Estate Deal March 2011

Russ August & Kabat lawyers Richard L. August, Deborah R. Clark and Matthew A. Rips closed a $200+ million dollar acquisition of a mixed-use high rise apartment and retail complex in Bethesda, Maryland, which included more than 400 apartments as well as Whole Foods, LA Fitness and other major retailers. The project included not only the acquisition of the real estate, but also the formation of an equity joint venture and the restructuring an assumption of existing debt financing.

Russ August & Kabat Wins Back-to-Back Summary Judgment Rulings and Motion for Clarification In Texas Patent Case June 2011

Russ August & Kabat Files Amicus Brief in United States Supreme Court on Behalf of Six Former U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Commissioners and Directors in the i4i v. Microsoft Case March 2011

Russ August & Kabat NewsRuss August & Kabat attorneys Alexander C.D. Giza, Marc A. Fenster, Larry C. Russ, Jules L. Kabat, and Benjamin T. Wang represented six former U.S. PTO Commissioners and Directors with the filing of an amicus brief in the i4i v. Microsoft case, a patent case currently pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. The case involves the proper legal standard of proof required to invalidate a U.S. patent.

See Brief.